Archive for August 9th, 2018

‘Whose side are we on?’ Theresa May urged to take action against ‘CORRUPT’ Russian money



THERESA May has been urged to take action against Russia by halting the “corrupt” flow of money through London in the wake of renewed US sanctions against Russia in response to the Salisbury poisoning.

CBI calls for UK to abandon immigration targets after Brexit

Employers’ body says EU citizens should not be included in Tier 2 visa system

CBI urges government to drop ‘blunt target’ on immigration numbers

Business leaders call on Theresa May to bring in new freedom of movement rules for EU citizens

The Confederation of British Industry has urged Theresa May to drop her “blunt target” on immigration numbers and introduce new freedom of movement rules for EU citizens post-Brexit to ensure firms, large and small, can stay in business when the UK leaves the bloc.

Outlining the results of a major consultation with business leaders, Josh Hardie, the CBI’s deputy director general, said companies believed an injection of honesty was urgently needed in the political debate about migration.

Continue reading...

Poll: British public wants second referendum if Brexit talks break down

LONDON — The British public would support a second Brexit vote by a margin of two to one if talks with Brussels break down, a new poll suggested.

In a YouGov survey of more than 10,000 people, 50 percent said that, in the event of a no-deal outcome in negotiations, they would prefer a fresh vote to MPs being handed the decision over country’s future, an option backed by just 25 percent.

Even without a breakdown in talks, support for a second vote is strong, with 45 percent backing the idea of a public vote on the outcome, 34 percent against and 22 percent unsure.

Significantly, support for a second referendum is overwhelming among supporters of Jeremy Corbyn’s opposition Labour party, with 63 percent backing the proposal, and only 18 percent against. Labour supporters would also back the Remain option in any vote by 77 percent, the poll suggests.

Corbyn and the Labour leadership have not ruled out backing a second referendum and the party is expected to face calls from members to change its policy at September’s annual conference in Liverpool.

The poll, commissioned by the Open Britain campaign group, found overall support for remaining in the EU is now at 53 percent, with Leave at 47 percent (excluding those who said they did not know.) The referendum in 2016 delivered a 52-48 victory for Leave. The poll also found strong support for the suggestion that “promises made by the Leave campaign will be broken” with 73 percent agreeing with the statement and 13 percent disagreeing.

Pollster Peter Kellner, former president of YouGov, in comments provided by the pro-second referendum People’s Vote campaign, said: “If the Brexit negotiations with Brussels break down, a two-to-one majority of voters want the public, not parliament, to decide what happens. Even people who voted Leave tend to prefer a new referendum, by 39-34 percent,” he said.

Regeneration and segregation in Belfast: rethinking the economics of peacebuilding

Belfast’s physical regeneration since the Good Friday Agreement has had socially and spatially uneven effects, writes Brendan Murtagh, with sites of modernity now sitting uncomfortably close to communities still affected by poverty, division, and violence. He emphasises the centrality of economics in the community relations and peacebuilding agenda, especially in the places left behind.

The latest collapse of the Stormont administration, scandals about a renewable heat initiative, and Brexit underscore the fragility of the Northern Ireland peace process. It is tempting to dismiss the progress that has been made in the last 20 years. Peace and economic development have bolstered inward investment, tourism, growth in high value sectors (cyber security, film production, and back office finance) as well as elite property precincts in the city centre and along the riverfront. These processes have also led to significant residential desegregation, especially where labour and housing markets intersect to create mixed religion, but overwhelmingly middle-class neighbourhoods.

However, at the same time as integration has increased in the south of Belfast, segregation has intensified in the north and west. This ‘twin-speed’ city sees new peace lines, poverty, and even violence sit uneasily alongside the face of modernity that the authorities like to project as the Belfast renaissance story. But, if economics has expanded integrated neighbourhoods, inter-group contact, and socio-spatial mobility, then where is class in the community relations and peacebuilding agenda?

Credit: Public Domain.

The community relations sector in Northern Ireland has developed enormously, bolstered by EU, US, and government funding over the last five decades. The sector has also done enormously good work in tackling sectarianism, the legacy of paramilitarism, the needs of victims and segregation in education, the workplace, and housing. Yet conflicts rarely remain frozen; they are instead constantly restructured in composition and meaning, and demand new and more flexible responses as they move temporally and spatially.

The economist Amartya Sen disputes the idea of a ‘civilian clash’ in global conflicts, arguing that identities around race or religion often mask underlying conditions of poverty and exclusion, which in turn act as a resource to mobilise disaffected groups for sectarian advantage. Northern Ireland may have been a late colonial relic, a sectarian statelet, and a divided community but it is clear that division is now most pronounced among the poorest and is increasingly reterritorialized where the benefits of the ‘peace economy’ simply have not reached. The knowledge economy that has expanded a more cosmopolitan and outward looking city is off-limits to the most divided and disadvantaged communities. They face a skills mismatch (with depressingly low levels of literacy and numeracy, especially among young males); and a spatial mismatch, in that new jobs are concentrated in investment sites that are not close to (or interested in) the poorest places.

A different regime, that is more sustainable in these conditions, has emerged in the form of social enterprises, intermediary labour markets, local trading, and (limited) community finance. It is not particularly new but has a proven record of success in creating jobs, labour mobility, cooperative start-ups, and in delivering services in areas where private and (increasingly) public markets are failing. As an example, the Ashton Community Trust in north Belfast employs 220 people, has a turnover of £8m, and has six business lines including childcare, housing maintenance, and professional counselling. It opened a high spec Fabrication Laboratory (FabLab) to teach digital skills and this has attracted people from both communities, across the interface and among the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the city. This offers a pathway to employment and has had significant effects on inter-community attitudes for the 700 young people who use it every year. But it does not assume that young people have constructed their identity around a strong sense of Britishness or Irishness. Some have, but for most these are simply not relevant to their sense of themselves, their interests or their aspirations.

Community relations practice often emphasises an identarian frame, which intentionally or unintentionally reinforces the very structures it purports to challenge. Single-identity work simply reproduces sectarianism and a sense of entitlement among thinly-constructed notions of the self and especially the community. ‘My community’ is the most overused and farcical term in the peace-building narrative, because it ultimately pits poor neighbourhoods against each other, encourages a race to the bottom and a destructive resource competition for increasingly limited funding.

In north Belfast, the social economy has developed facilities and services that are replacing interfaces; it has created new, reasonably-paid jobs and training pathways in sectors that work; brought people together as workers; recycled money in the local economy; created networks and alliances to strengthen community businesses; and provided opportunities for expression that refuses the containment of green and orange politics. Every £1.00 that the Ashton Community Trust invests creates a local multiplier effect of £1.78. They have supported the development of a new childcare centre on a notorious peace line and have developed links with advanced social economies in the Basque Country, Emelia Romagna, and Quebec.

But they have struggled to scale their work and without the right enabling environment, they face considerable challenges in growing the business. There is little actual evidence that social enterprises, certainly in Belfast, are being repositioned as a welfare alternative and most have developed in response to local service gaps, community mobilisation, the church, factory closures and so on.

Ethnic entrepreneurs in the form of flag protesters and dissident Republicans, of course, capitalise on these processes holding the bloc vote in place behind the peace lines that show no signs of moving. The DUP and Sinn Féin have little investment in an explicit desegregationist project, despite their previous commitment to removing the interfaces by 2023. The Irish Language Act is at the forefront of the political agenda, but works in the false consciousness that pulls back both communities from recognising their common economic position, history, and likely future.

There is no social economy strategy, no programme investment to support community businesses, nor progressive legislation (such as a Social Value Act or Community Asset Transfer), despite repeated calls for such support from projects in DUP and Sinn Féin heartlands. The weak regulatory environment extends to a lack of progress on social finance, public procurement and skills development; and despite their local impact, social enterprises remain as largely isolated, self-maintaining projects rather than a coherent movement capable of building cross-community alliances and business networks. Northern Ireland is likely to get its fifth EU Peace Programme (PEACE PLUS  2021-2027) and this provides an opportunity to reposition the post-conflict narrative around the people and places that were most affected by the violence and have benefited least from the peace.

_________

Note: the above draws on the author’s published work in Parliamentary Affairs.

About the Authors

Brendan Murtagh is Reader in the School of Natural and Built Environment at Queen’s University Belfast.

 

 

 

All articles posted on this blog give the views of the author(s), and not the position of LSE British Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Brussels BLINKS in Brexit standoff… but Rees-Mogg warns May heading for ‘PITIABLE FAILURE’



BRUSSELS was accused of “blinking” in the Brexit negotiations today amid reports that it was preparing a new offer to prevent a “no deal”.

Revealed: details of exclusive Russian deal offered to Arron Banks in Brexit run-up


Arron Banks has consistently denied receiving money from Russia but the source of his wealth has been under scrutiny since he gave Leave.EU £9m. Photograph: Simon Dawson/Reuters The full details of Ru...
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: index backlink | Thanks to insanity workout, car insurance and cyber security